The most popular posts among Peer Intelligence participants for the week ended May 22 discussed proposed revisions to the CAMELS supervisory ratings framework, the high costs of bad data, and why banks may bear greater responsibility for risk management as regulators move toward a less prescriptive supervisory approach. If you missed any of these, you may check them out below. Thanks for reading.
“Regulators Float Changes to CAMELS Ratings”
“The Hidden Cost of Bad Data in Banking: Financial Institutions Lose Millions Without Realizing It”
“As Regulatory Pressures Ease, the Need for Risk Discipline Does Not”
Did you miss our most recent Banking with Interest podcast with Richard Hunt, executive chairman of the Electronic Payments Coalition, on the expanding fight over interchange? Check it out here.